πŸ“Š Data Resources

Data & Datasets

Key data sources for nutrition program planning, targeting, and evaluation. Global databases, country surveys, demographic data, and geographic resources.

Why Data Matters

Good programs start with good data. Before designing interventions, you need to understand: Where is malnutrition concentrated? What are the underlying causes? Who is most vulnerable? What resources exist?

This page catalogs the most useful data sources for nutrition programming. Some are global databases you can access online. Others are country-level surveys you'll need to request. All are more reliable than guessing.

⚠️ Data Limitations

No dataset is perfect. Survey data may be 2-5 years old. Coverage is often incomplete. Methods vary across countries. Use data as a starting point, not gospel. Validate with local knowledge and recent rapid assessments.

What Kind of Data Do You Need?

πŸ“ˆ
Nutrition Data
Malnutrition prevalence, trends, and coverage of nutrition interventions. Core data for program planning and targeting.
Examples: Stunting rates, wasting prevalence, micronutrient deficiencies, IYCF practices, treatment coverage
πŸ‘₯
Demographic Data
Population characteristics, household composition, poverty levels. Essential for calculating program size and targeting vulnerable groups.
Examples: Population size, age structure, poverty rates, household characteristics, maternal education
πŸ—ΊοΈ
Geographic Data
Maps, administrative boundaries, facility locations, accessibility. Needed for logistics, site selection, and coverage planning.
Examples: Health facility maps, road networks, district boundaries, population density, travel times
πŸ”¬
Research & Evidence
Published studies, evaluations, and evidence on intervention effectiveness. Informs choice of interventions and implementation approaches.
Examples: Systematic reviews, impact evaluations, cost-effectiveness studies, implementation research

πŸ“š Major Nutrition Data Sources

These are the most important databases for nutrition program planning:

Demographic & Health Surveys (DHS)
USAID | Global Coverage
Nationally representative household surveys conducted in 90+ countries since 1984. Gold standard for nutrition, health, and demographic data. Includes anthropometry, IYCF practices, micronutrient indicators.
Coverage: 90+ countries
Frequency: Every 3-5 years
Access: Free with registration
Geographic Detail: Regional/provincial
Visit DHS Program β†’
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS)
UNICEF | Global Coverage
UNICEF-supported household surveys in 100+ countries. Similar to DHS but often in countries without DHS. Strong on child survival, nutrition, and WASH indicators.
Coverage: 100+ countries
Frequency: Every 3-5 years
Access: Free, public data
Geographic Detail: Regional/district
Visit MICS β†’
Global Nutrition Report Data
Independent | Global
Annual compilation of nutrition data from 193 countries. Country nutrition profiles with trends, targets, and progress tracking. Best for quick country overviews.
Coverage: 193 countries
Frequency: Annual updates
Access: Free, downloadable
Geographic Detail: National only
Visit GNR β†’
WHO Nutrition Landscape
WHO | Global
WHO's comprehensive database of country nutrition data. Includes malnutrition, micronutrients, policy indicators, and intervention coverage from multiple sources.
Coverage: All WHO countries
Frequency: Continuous updates
Access: Free, online portal
Geographic Detail: National, some subnational
Visit WHO Nutrition β†’
SMART Surveys
Various | Subnational
Standardized Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transitions surveys. Rapid assessments of malnutrition and mortality in emergency and development contexts.
Coverage: Emergency-affected areas
Frequency: 6-12 months (crises)
Access: Request from agencies
Geographic Detail: District/livelihood zones
SMART Methodology β†’
Humanitarian Data Exchange
OCHA | Crisis Countries
Open platform for sharing humanitarian data. Includes nutrition surveys, population data, facility locations, and administrative boundaries for crisis-affected countries.
Coverage: Crisis-affected countries
Frequency: Varies by dataset
Access: Free, open data
Geographic Detail: Subnational, facility-level
Visit HDX β†’

πŸ‘₯ Demographic & Geographic Data

Population & Demographic Data

  • WorldPop: High-resolution population density maps and demographic estimates. Essential for estimating target populations in specific areas.
  • UN Population Division: Country population projections and demographic indicators. Useful for medium-term planning.
  • National Census Data: Most detailed demographic data available. Contact national statistics offices. Often 10+ years old.
  • World Bank DataBank: Development indicators including poverty, education, health infrastructure. Good for contextual analysis.

Geographic & GIS Data

  • OpenStreetMap: Free, editable maps with roads, facilities, and administrative boundaries. Variable quality but improving.
  • GADM: Database of global administrative boundaries. Download shapefiles for any country free.
  • HealthSites.io: Crowdsourced database of health facility locations. Incomplete but useful where official data unavailable.
  • NASA FIRMS: Active fire data for tracking agricultural burning, conflict, or displacement. Real-time updates.

🎯 Assessing Data Quality

Not all data is created equal. Before using a dataset for program decisions, assess its quality:

πŸ“…
Recency
How old is the data? Nutrition situations change. Data >5 years old may not reflect current reality, especially post-crisis.
🎯
Representativeness
Does the sample represent your target area? National data may mask subnational variation. Urban data doesn't tell you about rural areas.
πŸ“
Sample Size
Large enough for reliable estimates? Small samples have wide confidence intervals. Check if subnational estimates are statistically valid.
πŸ”¬
Methodology
Were standardized methods used? WHO training? Equipment calibrated? Poorly conducted surveys produce misleading data.
🎭
Political Bias
Who collected the data and why? Government surveys may underreport problems. NGO assessments may overstate needs. Consider motivations.
πŸ“Š
Consistency
Do different sources agree? If DHS, MICS, and SMART surveys show vastly different prevalence, investigate why before using data.

πŸ›‘οΈ Using Data Responsibly

⚠️ Data Can Cause Harm

Data about vulnerable populations is sensitive. Malnutrition data can stigmatize communities. Detailed location data can enable targeting by armed groups. Ethnic/religious breakdowns can fuel discrimination.

Principles for Responsible Data Use

1. Privacy Protection

  • Never share individual-level data without consent
  • Aggregate data to at least district level before sharing publicly
  • Remove geographic precision (GPS coordinates) before publication
  • Consider whether ethnic/religious breakdowns are necessary or could cause harm

2. Context & Interpretation

  • Always provide context: "20% wasting" needs comparison to emergency thresholds
  • Explain limitations: sample size, geographic coverage, data age
  • Avoid ranking or shaming: "District X has highest malnutrition" can stigmatize
  • Present trends, not just snapshots: improving or worsening?

3. Avoid Misuse

  • Don't use data to justify predetermined conclusions
  • Don't cherry-pick indicators that support your narrative
  • Don't compare incomparable data (different methods, seasons, populations)
  • Don't claim precision you don't have (confidence intervals matter)

4. Community Ownership

  • Share findings with communities surveyed, not just donors
  • Use accessible language and formats, not just technical reports
  • Allow communities to respond to or contest findings
  • Credit local data collectors and knowledge holders

πŸ” When Data Doesn't Exist

Perfect data rarely exists for the exact question you need answered. What to do when there's a gap:

πŸ“‹ Options for Filling Data Gaps

  1. Use proxy indicators: If you don't have wasting data, poverty and food insecurity can indicate high-risk areas
  2. Extrapolate from nearby areas: If neighboring districts are similar, their data may roughly apply
  3. Rapid assessments: Small surveys (100-200 households) can give rough estimates quickly
  4. Key informant interviews: Local health workers and leaders know which areas are worst affected
  5. Program monitoring data: Screening data from existing programs reveals trends even if not representative
  6. Satellite/remote sensing data: Crop conditions, rainfall, vegetation indices correlate with malnutrition

βœ… Best Practice: Triangulate

Don't rely on one data source. Use multiple sources and methods. If survey data, key informant interviews, and health facility records all point to the same districts as high-need, you can be more confident. Contradictory data signals the need for better information before committing resources.

πŸš€ Next Steps

If you need data for program planning:

  1. Start with DHS or MICS for your countryβ€”check recency
  2. Look for SMART surveys or nutrition cluster data if in humanitarian context
  3. Download administrative boundaries and facility locations from HDX or OpenStreetMap
  4. Supplement with local knowledge and recent rapid assessments
  5. Document data sources, limitations, and assumptions for stakeholders

If you're collecting new data:

  • Use standardized methods (SMART, WHO) for comparability
  • Get ethical approval if required (university, ministry of health)
  • Train enumerators properlyβ€”bad data worse than no data
  • Build in data quality checks during collection
  • Share findings responsibly, protecting privacy
  • Use our Data Collection Protocol Builder